I did not expect to be in this position. I’ve had a number of offers to trade. And I haven’t accepted any of them.
I can’t give any particularly rational reason for my refusal to trade. It boils down to the fact that I really like Kellie Lambert’s painting and haven’t been offered a painting that I like better than it.
My current stinginess, however, has made me wonder about rationality.
As I’ve said in previous posts, the whole process of trading up must involve a good deal of irrational behavior. And I’ve speculated that perhaps the predictable irrationality of people is what makes trading up possible.
But I now am wondering whether it would make sense to reintroduce the lottery idea into this scheme. Just as a refresher, I had toyed with the idea of giving anyone who traded with me the right to enter into a lottery for the Van Gogh at half of what the price of a lottery ticket would be worth. People could then either sell their right or enter the lottery at a highly discounter price.
Were there to be a lottery of this sort, half of the irrationality in the trading process would be eliminated. With a lottery in place those who traded with me would collectively lose half the value of Van Gogh. But losing half the value of a Van Gogh is less irrational than losing its full value.
So should I or shouldn’t I try to inject this process with a little more rationality?
I am inclined to think that I shouldn’t. Despite the fact that I am partial to rationality – I have studied way too much Aristotle not to be – a brief look at the world would convince most anyone that irrationality reigns. Consider politics. Repeatedly shouting slogans, it would seem, is far more effective than calm rational deliberation.
Nonetheless, I am open to the potential power of rationality. So I have decided to make a decision based upon my next trade. If the person who trades with me would be willing to trade a significantly better painting if a lottery is involved, then I will go with a lottery. If not, then I won’t.
And since I am so concerned with rationality, I want to take this opportunity to tell the universe:
I want to trade my original Kellie Lambert for a significantly valuable painting.
I want to trade my original Kellie Lambert for a significantly valuable painting.
I want to trade my original Kellie Lambert for a significantly valuable painting.
Anyone who wants to trade, let me know.
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Just a suggestion, and maybe you have since I haven't looked around too much, but it might be a good idea to post the size of the painting along with the medium. When you start getting closer to Van Gogh, that will probably be key in trading value.
ReplyDeleteGood luck!
Thanks for the suggestion. I will do that.
ReplyDeletewhat if someone were to give you a painting w/o the trade. Then you would have 2 to trade for a better 1? Is it possible?
ReplyDeleteHi Walterhaus! I would love to get another painting without a trade. You are right. Then I would have two to trade, and surely two is better than one.
ReplyDelete